Based on the recently released financing and liability structures found within the DDA, I wholeheartedly OPPOSE the 49er Stadium.I believe Measure-J was misrepresented regarding the ultimate financial impact and liability to the City of Santa Clara and if voters were ask again the measure would not get a majority. It seems the entire agreement has been spun once Measure-J passed so now the 49ers have very little skin in the game. As you’ve have done so well in the past, I ask that you investigate this matter and report the true Stadium cost, liabilities, and ultimate public benefit to your readers. A billion dollar poor investment to employ low wage, seasonal jobs is not a way forward for the City of Santa Clara. Nor has it been for any other city.
Letter From Mike Rawlings
Mike Rawlings
Posted on
SPONSORED
You may like
The developer, Lamb Partners (Randy Lamb – Atherton Planning Commissioner) started to purchase the two single family homes along Monroe, 906 Monroe St. and 930 Monroe...
Santa Clara is the ONLY city in the entire State of California to have an elected Chief of Police. I contend that Santa Clarans...
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) states that racial discrimination in employment is illegal, as provided for under Title VII of the Civil...