No Evidence Found of Stadium Security Company “Problems” Despite Hints By Council Members

The City of Santa Clara reports that it has no records of labor or performance “problems” that were hinted at by Mayor Lisa Gillmor, Council Member Debi Davis and South Bay Labor Council Executive Ben Field against Landmark Event Staffing Services during weeks of public argument over the company’s contract renewal.

That was the answer to the Weekly’s public records request for reports, logs, meetings, minutes, emails, text messages and any other kind of documentation referencing or concerning the stadium security services provider’s performance.

The City’s response that there were “no conforming records” means that no records were found. Public agencies have to report the existence of relevant records protected by exclusions to California’s public meetings law, even if the records are being withheld.

SPONSORED
Let's talk measure_adLet's talk measure_ad

The insinuations against Landmark were made by Gillmor, Davis and Field during April Council discussions of Landmark’s contract with the 49ers’ stadium management company (ManCo). (Although the contract isn’t with the City, because the amount is so high, the City Council/Santa Clara Stadium Authority must approve it.)

“I heard there were events where people didn’t show up,” Debi Davis told 49ers VP of Stadium Operations Jim Mercurio at the April 4 Council meeting. Mercurio explained that the employees in question worked for another company that had been engaged in the past to supplement stadium security services.

Vague allegations about stadium subcontractors were aired at the April 11 meeting, without any clarification about who or what was being discussed. “We’ve had issues in the last three years. We don’t have performance standards,” Gillmor said. “It’s come to my attention that one of the contractors wasn’t paying their employees and we just found that out.”

“It seems to me like a deja vu thing,” said Davis, saying that she was bothered “that some people were contracted out and weren’t even paid.”

Field claimed in a blog post in early April that stadium security operations were “substandard” and told the Weekly in an interview that this was attested to by “multiple” YouTube videos, although he was unable to provide links to any specific videos.

The contract dispute was over whether or not the Santa Clara City Council can make the contract conditional on Landmark’s holding union negotiations.

SPONSORED
SiliconValleyVoice_Ad2_Jan04'24SiliconValleyVoice_Ad2_Jan04'24
AddThis Website Tools
Share
Carolyn Schuk

Recent Posts

CalMatters: How the State Sent Californians’ Personal Health Data to LinkedIn

The website that lets Californians shop for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, coveredca.com,…

April 29, 2025

SJSU’s Beethoven Center: Not Just For Academics

Music lovers, if you’re free on Thursday, May 1, you might want to take in…

April 29, 2025
SPONSORED

Jewish Advocacy Group Files Civil Rights Complaint Against SCUSD

Another ethnic minority group is accusing the Santa Clara Unified School District (SCUSD) of creating…

April 29, 2025

Kinder Morgan Fined Nearly $227K for Air Quality Violations at Bay Area Fuel Terminals

The Bay Area Air District (BAAD) has fined subsidiaries of Kinder Morgan, Inc. $226,990 for…

April 28, 2025

Carol Buchser, Won’t You Be My Neighbor?

After her book discussion group on March 25, Santa Clara resident Carol Buchser stopped off…

April 28, 2025

Image and Space: Nathan Oliveira at the Triton Museum

Bay Area artist Nathan Oliveira (1928-2010) described himself as an abstract artist whose work had…

April 27, 2025